Publications

Simultaneous design and trajectory optimization aims to find the best possible design of a dynamic engineering system, such as an aircraft, by considering the coupling between a physical system design and its trajectory. Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) fully considers this coupling and corresponding design trade-offs. This article discusses the computational efficiency of MDO formulations for design-trajectory optimization. We perform numerical studies to compare two MDO architectures and two design-trajectory coupling strategies on aircraft design test problems. The test problems concurrently optimize a climb trajectory, wing design based on a low-fidelity aerostructural analysis, and aircraft sizing variables. The results indicate that surrogate-based coupling is more efficient than direct coupling when there are only a few coupling variables from a trajectory to a disciplinary model, whereas direct coupling is preferable otherwise. The simultaneous analysis and design (SAND) architecture outperforms the multidisciplinary feasible (MDF) architecture when using direct coupling, whereas the costs of SAND and MDF are comparable with surrogate-based coupling. The results and discussion in this paper provide general guidelines for selecting a computationally efficient MDO formulation for simultaneous design and trajectory optimization.